Feenstra and Taylor dive right into a Ricardian model in Ch. 2 with some advanced features; Ch. 4 is H-O Model
In my experience (and from using other textbooks), it's better to build up slowly:
So if you are reading the textbook, it won't exactly match up to class for 1-2 weeks 😕
Imagine 2 countries, Home and Foreign
Each country can produce two goods, xylophones (x) and yams (y)
Each country has a fixed total supply of labor
Let:
lxx+lyy≤L
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
Points on the frontier are efficient (uses all available labor supply)
Points beneath the frontier are feasible (in production set) but inefficient (does not use all available labor supply)
Points above the frontier are impossible with current constraints (labor supply, technology, trading opportunities)
Slope of PPF: marginal rate of transformation (MRT)
Rate at which (domestic) market values tradeoff between goods x and y
Relative price of x (in terms of y), or opportunity cost of x: how many units of y must be given up to produce one more unit of x
A country has an absolute advantage if it requires less labor to produce (a unit of) a good
Examples:
A country has a comparative advantage in a producing a good if the opportunity cost of producing that good is lower than other countries
Recall the slope of PPF (the MRT) is the relative price (opp. cost) of x
Examples:
PPF slope = opportunity cost of good x (amount of y given up per 1 x)
If countries have different PPF slopes, have different opportunity costs
PPF slope = opportunity cost of good x (amount of y given up per 1 x)
If countries have different PPF slopes, have different opportunity costs
Country with flatter slope (smaller magnitude) has lower opportunity cost of x (or higher cost of y) implies a comparative advantage in x
PPF slope = opportunity cost of good x (amount of y given up per 1 x)
If countries have different PPF slopes, have different opportunity costs
Country with flatter slope (smaller magnitude) has lower opportunity cost of x (or higher cost of y) implies a comparative advantage in x
Country with steeper slope (larger magnitude) has higher opportunity cost of x (or lower cost of y) implies a comparative advantage in y
Example: Suppose the following facts to set up:
Home has 100 Laborers
Foreign has 100 Laborers
Example: Suppose the following facts to set up:
Home has 100 Laborers
Foreign has 100 Laborers
For each country, find the equation of the PPF and graph it.
Which country has an absolute advantage in producing x and y?
Which country has an comparative advantage in producing x and y?
lxx+lyy=L
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=100
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−x
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′1x+4y=100
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′1x+4y=1004y=100−x
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′1x+4y=1004y=100−xy=25−0.25x
y=50−0.5x
y=25−0.25x
lx=1
ly=2
l′x=1
l′y=4
lx=1 (Equal)
ly=2 (Absolute advantage)
l′x=1 (Equal)
l′y=4 (Absolute disadvantage)
So far, we assume countries are in autarky, they are not trading with one another
To find comparative advantage for each country, we need to compare opportunity costs of producing each good in each country, or relative prices in autarky
A country with a lower autarky relative price of a good than another country has a comparative advantage in producing that good
Autarky relative price of x: 0.5y [PPF slope!]
Autarky relative price of y: 2x
Autarky relative price of x: 0.25y [PPF slope!]
Autarky relative price of y: 4x
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Home has a comparative advantage in producing y
Foreign has a comparative advantage in producing x
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Suppose now countries open up trade
We considered the relative prices in autarky
We next need to consider what might relative prices be under international trade
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
A bit of handwaiving here:
Ricardo assumes a labor theory of value and constant marginal products of labor
We have hidden the MPL† for simplicity here
We are also in direct exchange (barter) between goods, there is no money here
Suffice it to say that we can show that the ratio of labor requirements (PPF slope) is equal to the ratio of prices of the final goods: lxlyslope=pxpy
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Home will:
The autarky price of y:
Home can export y to Foreign and sell at higher price!
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Foreign will:
The autarky price of x:
Foreign can export x to Home and sell at higher price!
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Possible range of world relative prices:
0.25y<px<0.5y
2x<py<4x
Home specializes in only producing y at point A
Foreign specializes in only producing x at point A'
Home exports y ⟹ less y sold in Home ⟹ ↑py in Home
As y arrives in Foreign ⟹ more y sold in Foreign ⟹ ↓py in Foreign
Home exports y ⟹ less y sold in Home ⟹ ↑py in Home
As y arrives in Foreign ⟹ more y sold in Foreign ⟹ ↓py in Foreign
Foreign exports x ⟹ less x sold in Foreign ⟹ ↑px in Foreign
Home exports y ⟹ less y sold in Home ⟹ ↑py in Home
As y arrives in Foreign ⟹ more y sold in Foreign ⟹ ↓py in Foreign
Foreign exports x ⟹ less x sold in Foreign ⟹ ↑px in Foreign
As x arrives in Home ⟹ more x sold in Home ⟹ ↓px in Home
p⋆xp⋆y=pxpy=p′xp′y
Must be within mutally agreeable range: 0.25y<px<0.5y 2x<py<4x
Suppose the world relative price of x settles to p⋆xp⋆y=0.4y
World relative price of x: p⋆xp⋆y=0.4y
Both countries face same international exchange rate with slope =−0.4
Home exports 20y to Foreign
Home exports 20y to Foreign
Foreign exports 50x to Home
Trade along world exchange rate (world relative prices) from specialization points (A and A') to consumption points (B and B') beyond PPFs!
Example: Suppose the following facts to set up:
Home has 100 Laborers
Foreign has 200 Laborers
Plot wheat (w) on the horizontal axis and cars (c) on the vertical axis.
For each country, find the equation of the PPF and graph it.
Which country has an absolute advantage in producing wheat and cars?
Which country has an comparative advantage in producing wheat and cars?
What will the range of possible terms of trade be?
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
Esc | Back to slideshow |
Feenstra and Taylor dive right into a Ricardian model in Ch. 2 with some advanced features; Ch. 4 is H-O Model
In my experience (and from using other textbooks), it's better to build up slowly:
So if you are reading the textbook, it won't exactly match up to class for 1-2 weeks 😕
Imagine 2 countries, Home and Foreign
Each country can produce two goods, xylophones (x) and yams (y)
Each country has a fixed total supply of labor
Let:
lxx+lyy≤L
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
lxx+lyy=L
y=Lly−lxlyx
Points on the frontier are efficient (uses all available labor supply)
Points beneath the frontier are feasible (in production set) but inefficient (does not use all available labor supply)
Points above the frontier are impossible with current constraints (labor supply, technology, trading opportunities)
Slope of PPF: marginal rate of transformation (MRT)
Rate at which (domestic) market values tradeoff between goods x and y
Relative price of x (in terms of y), or opportunity cost of x: how many units of y must be given up to produce one more unit of x
A country has an absolute advantage if it requires less labor to produce (a unit of) a good
Examples:
A country has a comparative advantage in a producing a good if the opportunity cost of producing that good is lower than other countries
Recall the slope of PPF (the MRT) is the relative price (opp. cost) of x
Examples:
PPF slope = opportunity cost of good x (amount of y given up per 1 x)
If countries have different PPF slopes, have different opportunity costs
PPF slope = opportunity cost of good x (amount of y given up per 1 x)
If countries have different PPF slopes, have different opportunity costs
Country with flatter slope (smaller magnitude) has lower opportunity cost of x (or higher cost of y) implies a comparative advantage in x
PPF slope = opportunity cost of good x (amount of y given up per 1 x)
If countries have different PPF slopes, have different opportunity costs
Country with flatter slope (smaller magnitude) has lower opportunity cost of x (or higher cost of y) implies a comparative advantage in x
Country with steeper slope (larger magnitude) has higher opportunity cost of x (or lower cost of y) implies a comparative advantage in y
Example: Suppose the following facts to set up:
Home has 100 Laborers
Foreign has 100 Laborers
Example: Suppose the following facts to set up:
Home has 100 Laborers
Foreign has 100 Laborers
For each country, find the equation of the PPF and graph it.
Which country has an absolute advantage in producing x and y?
Which country has an comparative advantage in producing x and y?
lxx+lyy=L
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=100
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−x
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′1x+4y=100
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′1x+4y=1004y=100−x
lxx+lyy=L1x+2y=1002y=100−xy=50−0.5x
l′xx+l′yy=L′1x+4y=1004y=100−xy=25−0.25x
y=50−0.5x
y=25−0.25x
lx=1
ly=2
l′x=1
l′y=4
lx=1 (Equal)
ly=2 (Absolute advantage)
l′x=1 (Equal)
l′y=4 (Absolute disadvantage)
So far, we assume countries are in autarky, they are not trading with one another
To find comparative advantage for each country, we need to compare opportunity costs of producing each good in each country, or relative prices in autarky
A country with a lower autarky relative price of a good than another country has a comparative advantage in producing that good
Autarky relative price of x: 0.5y [PPF slope!]
Autarky relative price of y: 2x
Autarky relative price of x: 0.25y [PPF slope!]
Autarky relative price of y: 4x
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Home has a comparative advantage in producing y
Foreign has a comparative advantage in producing x
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Suppose now countries open up trade
We considered the relative prices in autarky
We next need to consider what might relative prices be under international trade
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
A bit of handwaiving here:
Ricardo assumes a labor theory of value and constant marginal products of labor
We have hidden the MPL† for simplicity here
We are also in direct exchange (barter) between goods, there is no money here
Suffice it to say that we can show that the ratio of labor requirements (PPF slope) is equal to the ratio of prices of the final goods: lxlyslope=pxpy
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Home will:
The autarky price of y:
Home can export y to Foreign and sell at higher price!
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Foreign will:
The autarky price of x:
Foreign can export x to Home and sell at higher price!
Autarky Relative Prices (Opportunity Costs)
1x | 1y | |
---|---|---|
Home | 0.5y | 2x |
Foreign | 0.25y | 4x |
Possible range of world relative prices:
0.25y<px<0.5y
2x<py<4x
Home specializes in only producing y at point A
Foreign specializes in only producing x at point A'
Home exports y ⟹ less y sold in Home ⟹ ↑py in Home
As y arrives in Foreign ⟹ more y sold in Foreign ⟹ ↓py in Foreign
Home exports y ⟹ less y sold in Home ⟹ ↑py in Home
As y arrives in Foreign ⟹ more y sold in Foreign ⟹ ↓py in Foreign
Foreign exports x ⟹ less x sold in Foreign ⟹ ↑px in Foreign
Home exports y ⟹ less y sold in Home ⟹ ↑py in Home
As y arrives in Foreign ⟹ more y sold in Foreign ⟹ ↓py in Foreign
Foreign exports x ⟹ less x sold in Foreign ⟹ ↑px in Foreign
As x arrives in Home ⟹ more x sold in Home ⟹ ↓px in Home
p⋆xp⋆y=pxpy=p′xp′y
Must be within mutally agreeable range: 0.25y<px<0.5y 2x<py<4x
Suppose the world relative price of x settles to p⋆xp⋆y=0.4y
World relative price of x: p⋆xp⋆y=0.4y
Both countries face same international exchange rate with slope =−0.4
Home exports 20y to Foreign
Home exports 20y to Foreign
Foreign exports 50x to Home
Trade along world exchange rate (world relative prices) from specialization points (A and A') to consumption points (B and B') beyond PPFs!
Example: Suppose the following facts to set up:
Home has 100 Laborers
Foreign has 200 Laborers
Plot wheat (w) on the horizontal axis and cars (c) on the vertical axis.
For each country, find the equation of the PPF and graph it.
Which country has an absolute advantage in producing wheat and cars?
Which country has an comparative advantage in producing wheat and cars?
What will the range of possible terms of trade be?